Stats
Last updated 16 September 2026
Every swap that settles through Flip lands here, auto-aggregated from the NEAR Intents Explorer. The numbers below are the most recent 500 swaps — lifetime totals will appear here when the pagination upgrade ships.
Public on purpose. The honest argument for non-custodial cross-chain swap is that the volume settles natively, in production, on chains users can verify. The page is the verification.
Velocity
Rolling-window throughput. The 24-hour number is the live-feel metric; the 7- and 30-day windows show whether the live feel is sustained or just a one-day spike.
By chain
Volume by chain — combined source-side and destination-side participation. A single swap touches two chains, so the chain volumes here sum to roughly double the total volume above. This is the right framing for chain-level corridor health, not a second total.
- 1tron29 src · 68 dest$1.30M
- 2eth111 src · 89 dest$1.15M
- 3zec26 src · 12 dest$318k
- 4bsc22 src · 8 dest$239k
- 5btc34 src · 19 dest$150k
- 6arb26 src · 21 dest$133k
- 7near66 src · 47 dest$132k
- 8sol77 src · 98 dest$88k
Top corridors
The five most-settled token pairs across the window. Each row is a single direction (BTC → USDC and USDC → BTC are separate).
- 1SWEATnear→SWEATbase22 · $0
- 2USDTeth→USDTtron17 · $185k
- 3SOLsol→ETHeth17 · $1.3k
- 4ETHeth→SOLsol15 · $5.2k
- 5wNEARnear→ZECnear13 · $1.5k
Methodology. Numbers come from the NEAR Intents Explorer API, scoped to Flip's distribution channel. "Settled swaps" means status SUCCESSonly — failed, refunded, and incomplete-deposit transactions count toward the attempts denominator for the success-rate metric but not the volume totals. USD values are at time of swap, not today's prices. Refreshed hourly.
The cross-chain bridges page shows the alternative: ~$3B lost across 18 incidents. This page is the answer.